In today’s @BostonGlobe, Joan Wickersham makes a very good point about
the extraordinary level of violence in today’s TV commercials. In “The
Violence Pitch” she contrasts the simple non-violent ads created in 1968 by
the folks on @MadMen_AMC with the actual commercials run in 2013 by companies that
sponsor the program. Noting that the
sponsors clearly think that mayhem sells, she asks why “less than a month after
the Boston Marathon bombing attacks and the defeat of the gun bill in Congress,
so many advertisers today think that in order to sell products it is necessary
or desirable to show people punched, bludgeoned, kicked, shot, stabbed, held
hostage, strangled, blown up, bloodied, and dead?”
Good question and this is the right time to ask it. But I would look for an answer from the
creative teams at the ad agencies for those sponsors. They are the ones creating the ad concepts
and selling them to the sponsors.
Don Draper Presents Ad Concept |
It’s the copywriters, the designers and the creative directors who are
churning out this stuff. I can just
picture the conference room in which the creative team and the account manager
convince the client that their concepts are ‘edgy” or “hip” or “pushing
the envelope.” (I’ve sat in that
conference room many times and I’ve heard similar pitches.) Sure, the clients are the ones buying ads
filled with mayhem, but they would probably buy something less offensive if they
had the option and if it were presented to them.
We won’t stop seeing these ads until the sponsors recoil from hip and edgy
creative concepts that show mayhem, blood and death and reject them. When the advertising department of a consumer
product says, “That’s sick and disgusting.
I don’t want it associated with my product,” it will be a victory not
just for those companies but for all of us.
The truth is that these ads may be edgy but it’s a cheap thrill and one
that does not serve the product well. Edgy topics
are where creative teams stop when they don’t want to push harder or go to the next
step so they can really get creative. Corporate
ad managers who pay for these ads, who convince themselves the ads are good,
and who stay with the agency that produces them, do not do any favors for themselves
or their products.
Keep in mind that they only way companies have of measuring success is if
sales rise or fall when the ads run. Maybe
we, the TV audience, should start Tweeting and Yelping and Facebooking to protest mayhem in
advertising. A social media campaign
just might get their attention.
It’s not just the ads, or course—programming has fallen into the same
abbatoir. Some of the ads Ms. Wickersham
objects to are the promos for TV shows. But
that’s an even bigger topic and it will be another post on another day.
is it just my grandfatherly perspective, or are the At&T ads with a man and a few little kids discussing more vs less, and fast vs slow some of the most amusing and best advertising on TV lately?
ReplyDelete